This would allow policies to be put in place that could limit the potential excesses of gambling and minimize the role of the criminal element. So how successful has this regime of prohibition been at eliminating sports betting? By almost any measure it is a failure. As side benefits, a legalized regime would likely displace the widespread illegal operations. Gambling is a subject that many feel passionately about. As bookmakers move further from U.S. A legalized regime is a better way to mitigate the potential dangers of Internet betting.
To begin, let’s take a closer look at betting on major sports, which is currently illegal in all states besides Nevada, regardless of whether it involves the Internet. Because Internet gaming operations are often located outside of the U.S., there is little Washington can do to restrict their actions.
Moreover, a prohibition policy has perverse effects and encourages the behavior it seeks to curtail. This is nearly 100 times the amount bet on professional sports with legal bookmakers in Nevada.
The sheer size of the illegal sports betting markets only tells part of the story. A recently completed report from theNational Gambling Impact Study Commission (search)estimates that individuals wager between $80 and $380 billion dollars with illegal bookmakers. Internet operations catering to U.S. The on-street bookmakers have experience in providing and servicing financial credit, which would be difficult for the Internet books to provide given the difficulty of enforcing a debt contract from afar. In the case of the bookmakers I have records for, about a quarter of the bettors appear to be New York Yankees fans who wager consistently on their team. First, they offer short-term credit, and allow bettors to wager for a week or longer without fronting any money. soil to escape its influence, it will become harder and harder to legalize Internet gaming in the future as the bookmakers get ensconced in their offshore locations.
A far more sensible policy would be to legalize Internet bookmakers. But the argument for legalization and regulation should have appeal for opponents and supporters of gambling alike.
Koleman Strumpf, associate professor of economics at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, is a visiting fellow at the Cato Institute.
. citizens operate from bases in countries as diverse as Antigua, Costa Rica and Australia.
Presuming the current attempts at prohibiting Internet sports betting persist, what might we expect to see? First, there will be a growing alliance between Internet bookmakers and the more traditional illegal bookmaker. An important feature of the Internet is that it makes physical distance largely irrelevant, and from a bettor’s perspective it is just as convenient to wager on-line with an Antigua bookmaker as with one down the street. This is illustrated by a close examination of one of the most popular forms of gambling: sports betting. I found that illegal bookmakers utilize policies that exacerbate the potential harm of gambling. It is perhaps understandable that such an option is rarely considered. While price discrimination does have an important role to play in free markets, it is likely that consistent use of it would be precluded if sports betting was legalized and above-board.
Right now, Internet gambling is proliferating.
With the steady rise of commercial activity on the Internet, Congress has been moving toward a formal prohibition ofonline gambling (search).
While such policies might spring from a moral viewpoint, they are unlikely to succeed in limiting online betting. Such interaction will help reinforce the influence of the illegal sector and will exacerbate the perceived problems of sports betting, such as facilitating money laundering.
Second, prohibition will drive the Internet operators further from the U.S. They know that many bettors are fans of certain teams. While these bans are primarily enforced by states, the federal government does get involved if wagers cross state lines or there is an alleged involvement of organized crime. I recently completed an analysis of illegalbookmakers (search)in New York City using actual records seized in a series of arrests by the Kings County (Brooklyn) District Attorney office. A similar ban on all Internet-based sports betting also is likely to fail. The bookmakers understand this tendency and”price discriminate” (search)against such bettors: They charge them a higher price for their Yankees bets. There is a large demand forsports betting (search), and a large illegal sector has arisen to provide this activity despite a long-standing policy of prohibition. There is already evidence that Internet operations have started to pay their illegal on-shore cousins to run their credit business. Most of the bettors in my records would be consideredcompulsive gamblers (search), wagering almost every day and laying hundreds of dollars at a time.
Second, illegal bookmakers take advantage of people’s mistakes
Latest posts by David E. Ramsey (see all)
- First bookmaker opens in gambling-mad Spain| Reuters - March 21, 2017
- A Beginners Guide To Betting On Greyhound Racing - January 9, 2017
- Two top college football punters killed in car wreck - September 11, 2016